|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1841
Lecture XXX
Entire Consecration
a Condition of Discipleship
|
|
Text.--Luke 14:33: "Whosoever he be of you that forsaketh not all that he hath, he cannot be my disciple."
In this discussion I design to show:
I. What is not implied in forsaking all for Christ.
II. What is implied in it.
III. What is intended by being a disciple of Christ.
IV. That being his disciple is an indispensable condition of salvation.
V. That forsaking all is an indispensable condition of discipleship.
VI. We have no right to profess discipleship nor to ask for divine teaching, only so far as we live in a state of entire consecration to God.
I. What is not implied in forsaking all for Christ.
II. What is implied in forsaking all for Christ.
III. What is intended by being a disciple of Christ.
IV. Being Christ's disciple, or divine teaching, is an express and indispensable condition of salvation.
V. Forsaking all is an indispensable condition of discipleship.
VI. We have no right to profess discipleship, nor to ask for divine teaching, only so far as we live in a state of entire consecration to God.
REMARKS.
1. Entire consecration and entire sanctification are the same thing. I have been
amazed many times of late to hear persons contending for the doctrine of entire consecration
to God in this life, who pretend to reject the doctrine of entire sanctification,
as if they were different things. Now the very meaning of the term Sanctification
is consecration. This is the meaning of the term as used both in the Old and New
Testaments. It is really astonishing to see how much play there can be upon a word
among professedly good men. They dare not deny the doctrine of entire consecration
to God in this life, but having committed themselves against the doctrine of entire
sanctification, they try to preserve their consistency in holding to the one and
rejecting the other, thus assuming what is certainly contrary to fact, that they
are different things.
It is not a little curious that some writers in the religious periodicals of the
day, are opposing the doctrine of entire sanctification, while they profess that
all ought to preach the doctrine of entire consecration, not only as a thing attainable,
but as something which we are to expect to attain in this life. I say again, to sanctify
is to set apart; to consecrate to the service of God. Consecration and sanctification
to God are words of precisely similar import.
2. So far is entire sanctification from being unattainable or a rare attainment with
real Christians in this life, that it is the very beginning of true religion in all
the saints. It is the very first act of obedience. This has been substantially insisted
upon by all the leading orthodox writers for ages. Pres. Edwards says upon this subject,
in his treatise upon the "Religious Affections," vol. 5 of his Works, pp.
264-5:
"And this point may be farther illustrated and confirmed, if it be considered, that the holy scriptures abundantly place sincerity and soundness in religion, in making a full choice of God as our only Lord and portion, forsaking all for Him, and in a full determination of the will for God and Christ, on counting the cost; in our hearts closing and complying with the religion of Jesus Christ, with all that belongs to it, embracing it with all its difficulties, as it were hating our dearest earthly enjoyments, and even our own lives, for Christ; giving up ourselves with all that we have, wholly and for ever unto Christ, without keeping back any thing or making any reserve. In one word, sincerity consists in the great duty of self-denial for Christ; or in denying, that is, as it were disowning and renouncing ourselves for Him, making ourselves nothing that He may be all. Mat. 5:29, 30: 'If thy right eye offend thee, pluck it out, and cast it from thee; for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell. And if thy right hand offend thee, cut it off, and cast it from thee; for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell.' Mat. 6:24: 'No man can serve two masters; for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and Mammon.' Mat. 10:37-39: 'He that loveth father or mother more than me, is not worthy of me; and he that loveth son or daughter more than me, is not worthy of me; and he that taketh not his cross and followeth after me, is not worthy of me. He that findeth his life shall lose it; and he that loseth his life for my sake, shall find it.' Mat. 13:44-46. Luke 14:16-20, 25-33, and 16:13. Rom. 6:3-8. Gal 2:20, and 6:14. Phil. 3:7-10. 1 John 2:15. Rev. 14:4. Gen. 12:1-4, with Heb. 11:8-10. Gen. 22:12, and Heb. 11:17, 24-27. Deut. 13:6, and 33:9. Now surely having a heart to forsake all for Christ, tends to actually forsaking all for Him, so far as there is occasion, and we have the trial. Having a heart to deny ourselves for Christ, tends to denying ourselves in deed, when Christ and self-interest stand in competition. A giving up of ourselves, with all that we have, in our hearts, without making any reserve there, tends to our behaving ourselves universally as his, as subject to his will, and devoted to his ends. Our hearts entirely closing with the religion of Jesus, with all that belongs to it, and as attended with all its difficulties, upon a deliberate counting of the cost, tends to a universal closing with the same in act and deed, and actually going through all the difficulties we meet with in the way of religion, and so holding out with patience and perseverance."
Now here President Edwards expressly maintains all that is asserted in this discourse
in respect to the real meaning of this text, and fully confirms the idea that entire
consecration in the sense here explained is implied in "sincerity" in religion,
and that it is indispensable to the existence of true religion in the soul. Indeed,
he here fully asserts all that any of us at Oberlin have ever pretended to teach
on the subject of entire sanctification; for observe, that he teaches in this paragraph,
where he is discoursing particularly upon the nature or attributes of true religion,
not only entire, but also continued sanctification. This Pres. Edwards says is indispensable
to "sincerity or soundness in religion at all." And let me ask, suppose
any person to be just what Pres. Edwards here asserts to belong to and implied in
the very existence of religion in the soul, what more does God require of him? Just
read over the paragraph again, and see if the orthodox Pres. Edwards does not teach
the very doctrine, in all its length and breadth, for which we have contended. He
is not speaking of some rare attainment in religion, but of that which is indispensable
to the very beginning of religion, as that without which there is no "sincerity
or soundness in religion."
President Edwards, then, with all his fears of the doctrine of Christian Perfection,
when describing true religion, asserts and maintains the very sentiment for which
we contend, only changing the phraseology, but manifestly meaning the same thing.
3. What a deplorable state of things is that when the church and its ministers, many
of them, seriously call in question the practical attainability, in this life, of
that which constitutes the very beginning of true religion.
4. Nor is the fact that religion consists in entire consecration, at all inconsistent
with growth in grace. To grow in grace is to grow in favor with God, for this is
the meaning of the language. A child may consecrate all its little powers to God,
and yet continue to grow in grace, that is, in the favor of God. This is asserted
to have been actually the case with the Lord Jesus Christ Himself. The word rendered
"in favor," in the case of Christ, being that which is elsewhere rendered
grace. As knowledge extends, holiness will ever extend; and thus the saints will
grow in grace to all eternity.
5. You can see why Christ found fault with the members of one of the churches for
having left its "first love." Their first love was right. It was entire
consecration. And He regarded their having left their first love as an act of apostacy,
for which He threatened them with destruction.
6. As regeneration consists in entire sanctification, or consecration to God, the
only question that can reasonably be agitated is in respect to its permanency--whether,
as a matter of fact, we may expect to continue in our first love--whether we may
expect to abide in a state of entire consecration, or whether backsliding is a thing
to be expected of course?
7. Who, after all, can really doubt that, by the grace of God, a convert may avoid
backsliding? Who can really doubt, if he be properly instructed, that he may continue
to grow in grace, as he grows in the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ, until he
becomes rooted and grounded in love?
8. But this would be a state of permanent or continued sanctification. To my mind
it is really shocking, that the Church should be alarmed when it is taught that persons
are to expect to attain a state of entire sanctification in this life. It is certainly
a monstrous error, to maintain that any thing short of entire consecration to God
is regeneration. If any thing short of this is admitted by the teachers of religion
to be true religion, it will inevitably lead the Church into a fatal error. And here
I could inquire of my brethren upon my knees in agony, whether it is not true that
the preaching of the present day often makes the impression that entire consecration
to God is a rare attainment--something to be aimed at indeed--but seldom if ever
reached in this life--that the best services of the saints, and the best states of
mind in which they are, are mingled with much that is wrong--and that they hourly,
nay, continually offend and even sin in their most holy performances. Now how infinitely
dangerous is such teaching as this. How many thousands of souls have gone to hell,
because they have been led to believe they could be truly religious and yet be conscious
of sin all the time. They have been convicted, felt condemned, and conscious indeed
that their best performances were sinful. But they have been taught that this is
the case with all true saints, and that a consciousness of present sin is not at
all inconsistent with their being saints. Nay, that the more deeply conscious they
are, of sinning daily, in word, thought and deed, the greater is the evidence of
their humility, knowledge of their own hearts, and of the soundness of their piety.
Now I humbly ask is this the standard God has set up? Does this look like complying
with the conditions of this and many similar texts? Is this daily living in sin consistent
with being a disciple of Christ? I beseech you, my brethren, look to this, and see
whether the blood of deceived professors is not to be found in your skirts. Why,
some of you talk about the dangerous tendency of preaching the doctrine of entire
sanctification in this life. What can it mean, my brethren, that you do not perceive
the dangerous tendency of preaching the opposite doctrine--the absolutely ruinous
tendency of admitting, for one moment, that any thing less than a state of entire
consecration, is at all acceptable to God, or at all consistent with the existence
of true religion. Here I wish to be understood. I do not mean to be understood, that
a person's occasionally falling into sin, is entirely inconsistent with his ever
having been converted, or with his being a true Christian. But I do mean, and I solemnly
believe, that Christ meant to teach, that nothing is acceptable to God, short of
entire obedience; and that every act which is really acceptable to God implies entire
consecration to God. I have so recently addressed you upon this subject, that I need
not enlarge upon these thoughts.
9. Continuance in your first love, or in a state of entire consecration, or sanctification
to God, is indispensable to the enjoyment of divine teaching. Remember, I beseech
you, that this is the express condition, upon which alone you are to expect the teachings
of Christ. Unless, therefore, you continue in this state, daily and hourly fulfill
this condition, you have no right to come to Christ, expecting to be taught of Him.
If you do expect it, you will not receive it. If you pray for the teachings of the
Holy Spirit, you will not receive his influences, unless you live up to his divine
instructions, obey all the light you have, and thus live in a state of entire consecration.
10. You see why so few persons really enjoy the continual teachings of the Holy Spirit--why
they so often pray for the Spirit to teach them, and are not taught by Him. Why is
it, that you, my brethren, so often ask for the Holy Spirit, and pray for divine
guidance and teaching, and do not receive what you ask? I can answer for you. It
is because you do not fulfill the condition, upon which alone you are to receive
his influences. You are indulging some form of selfishness. You do not literally
forsake all that you have. If you did, you might approach Christ, at any time, with
the assurance that He will teach you. But as it is, He says to you, "Why call
ye me Lord, Lord, and do not the things I say?" "Why do you claim me as
your teacher, and come to me for instruction, when you do not comply with the expressed
conditions, upon which alone I have promised to teach you?"
11. You see that whenever you go to pray for divine teaching, that this question
must be distinctly before you, whether you so live in the fulfillment of the condition,
that you have a right to ask for his instruction? Many persons live in selfishness.
They are as conscious, that they do not live in a state of entire consecration, as
they are that they live at all. And yet they continue to pray for divine teaching,
as if they fulfilled the condition. Sometimes they deceive themselves, by thinking
they are taught of Christ, when they are only amusing themselves with their own delusions,
or following the suggestions of Satan. At other times they so often pray for divine
teaching, with a consciousness that they do not receive it, as to become discouraged,
and feel as if praying was of but very little use. They really doubt, whether the
promises of Christ mean what they say. In all this they overlook the fact, that there
is an express condition to these promises, although not in all cases immediately
connected with them. Yet, in our text, and in multitudes of similar passages, it
is expressed in the plainest language; with which they do not comply.
12. You see why the Bible is so little understood, even by the Church of God. While
the church is in such a state as to doubt whether, as a matter of fact they are expected
to live one single day without sin, it is no wonder they do not enjoy divine teaching.
How can they understand the Bible without the Spirit of God? And how can they have
the Holy Ghost without being in a state of entire consecration, or in other words,
without living in all respects up to the best light they have? When you obey one
truth, Christ will teach you another. And of what use is it for Him to continue to
teach, while you refuse to obey?
13. You can see why so few persons make a thorough proficiency in Theological study.
If young men in the study of Theology, or ministers of any age, neglect to fulfill
the conditions, and live in a state of entire consecration to God, they will not,
and cannot of course enjoy divine teaching, and of course, will make very little
proficiency in Theological study.
14. You can see why ministers are so often at a loss to know what to preach; seem
to be so dull and dark, and feel it so difficult to prepare for the pulpit. If they
lived in a state of entire consecration, their feelings would be the very reverse
of all this. They would enjoy the continual teaching of Christ. They would continually
feed the Church with knowledge and understanding. And out of their belly, as Christ
has said, would flow rivers of living water.
15. You can see from this subject, what great injustice a minister does to Christ,
and to the Church to which he ministers, if he does not live in a state of entire
consecration to God. Why, suppose a Church employ a minister, and instead of his
living in such a manner as to enjoy divine teaching, he indulges selfishness, appetite
and lust, and thus deprives himself of the teaching of Christ. How infinitely does
it endanger souls! How greatly does it dishonor God!
16. How much of the praying for the influence of the Holy Spirit is really mocking
and tempting God. See that band of selfish professors of religion. They are assembled
for a prayer meeting. Every one of them perhaps, is as conscious that he does not
live up to the best light he has, that he does not forsake all that he has and live
in a state of entire consecration to God, as he is of his own existence. Now what
are they assembled for? Why, to pray for divine teaching, for the outpouring of the
Holy Spirit upon them and upon others. Indeed. And is not this tempting God? You
ought to remember the word of the Lord in Ezek. 14:3: "Son of man, these men
have set up their idols in their heart, and put the stumbling-block of their iniquity
before their face: should I be inquired of at all by them?" Now see these same
professors daily around the family altar, praying for divine teaching, without so
much as seriously intending to live for a single day in a state of entire consecration
to God. Why do they make such prayers? Why do they indulge the expectation of mercy,
the influence of Christ's Spirit to instruct them? I answer, because they are not
themselves thoroughly and continually taught, that a state of entire consecration
is the indispensable condition of being a disciple of Christ. Why, instead of this,
the impression is made upon them, that a state of entire consecration is the rarest
attainment in the world. And thus they live on, dragging their way down to death
and hell, afraid of the doctrine of entire consecration to God in this life--and
well, with their views, they may be, for surely it is something entirely inconsistent
with their experience. And when shall they ever have a different experience, unless
the teachers of religion thoroughly awake to a state of entire consecration themselves,
and to the duty of insisting universally upon entire consecration as the indispensable
condition of discipleship?
17. Now, beloved, is it not one of the most astonishing things in the world, that
with this and so many similar texts upon this subject in the hands of the Church,
a state of entire consecration should be so little insisted upon, as indispensable
to any degree of true religion?
18. Forsaking all that you have, deadness to selfishness, and to other lovers, is
indispensable to the enjoyment of God and of Christ. A wife enjoys the society of
her husband just in proportion as her heart is swallowed up in him. His presence
is no satisfaction to her if she does not love him. If she have other lovers, the
presence of her husband is but an annoyance to her. Just so with you. Unless you
are supremely devoted to Christ, his presence would be but an annoyance to you.
19. You see why He so often cuts off every dependence on an idol. He is jealous over
you with a godly jealously. If He sees you going after idols and other lovers, He
will often interfere and remove them out of the way.
20. The doctrine of entire consecration or entire sanctification in this life is
no new doctrine. It is as old as the Bible, and as old as true religion. And as I
said before, the only question respects the continuance and permanency of this state
in this life, and not at all whether a state of entire consecration is attained in
the present life.
21. Sinners can see what they have to do to become Christians. You must renounce
your selfishness and become supremely and disinterestedly benevolent. You must change
your heart, forsake all that you have and consecrate your all to Christ.
22. To refuse or neglect to do this is to continue in a state of high-handed injustice
and rebellion against God. It is refusing to render to God that which belongs to
Him. It is to refuse to become an honest man, to do what is right because it is right.
Until you do this, God cannot and ought not to forgive you.
23. And let me remind you all once more, that when you go to God in prayer, if you
would be heard, you must go with the consciousness that you fulfill the condition;
and remember, that if our heart condemn us, God is greater than our heart, and knoweth
all things. Beloved, if our heart condemn us not, then have we confidence toward
God. And whatsoever we ask, we receive of Him, because we keep his commandments and
do those things that are pleasing in his sight." I Jn. 3:20-22. Now, therefore,
I beseech you, remember to fulfill the condition, that you may enjoy the teaching
of Christ. Except you be his disciple, you cannot be saved. And you cannot be his
disciple, only as you "forsake all that you have."
GLOSSARY
of easily misunderstood terms as defined by Mr. Finney himself.
Compiled by Katie Stewart
.
Next "Oberlin
Evangelist"
RELATED STUDY AID:
---New Window
Index for "The
Oberlin Evangelist": Finney:
Voices of Philadelphia
.
Homepage Holy Bible
.Jehovah Jesus
Timeline .Prophecy Philadelphia Fellowship Promises Stories Poetry Links
Purpose ||.What's New
|| Tribulation Topics || Download Page || Today's Entry
Topical Links:
Salvation || Catholicism || Sound Doctrine || Prayer
Privacy Policy
.