|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phila |
delphia > On Loving God- No. 1 by Charles G. Finney from "The Oberlin Evangelist" |
|
|
|
|
1860
Lecture I
On Loving God- No. 1
|
Charles G. Finney
1792-1875
A Voice from the Philadelphian Church Age
|
by Charles Grandison Finney
Public Domain Text
Reformatted by Katie Stewart
from "The Oberlin Evangelist"
June 20, 1860
Lecture I.
ON LOVING GOD--NO. 1
by the Rev. C. G. Finney
Text.--Matt. 22:37-38:
"Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy
heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first and great
commandment."
The connection in which this passage stands is striking. Our Savior was constantly
engaged in rebuking the delusions and sophistries of the Sadducees. They were a sect
of semi-infidels, embracing in the times of our Savior, many of the rich and honored
of the nation. On this occasion, Matthew remarks that when the Pharisees had heard
that He had put the Sadducees to silence, they gathered about Him, and one of them
being a lawyer (not an attorney in our modern sense of lawyer, but a man who was
skilled in the Mosaic law,) asked Him a question, tempting Him. It was this: "Which
is the great commandment of the law?"
To this question, Jesus promptly answered as in our text: "Thou shalt love the
Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This
is the first and great commandment. And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love
thy neighbour as thyself. On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets."
Mark how comprehensive our Lord makes His exposition of the fundamental law. All
the books of Moses and the prophets hang upon it -- are embraced within it. Everything
indeed written or unwritten -- the entire preceptive part of religion is here. It
covers the whole field of moral obligation to God and to man.
It would require a whole course of lectures to discuss this subject fully. I propose
only to touch briefly on some of its main points:
I. The kind of love here required.
II. I must next notice some things implied in this love.
III. I must next enquire -- What are the grounds of this obligation to love God?
IV. Next let us notice the natural consequences of refusing to render this supreme
love and service to God.
V. I must next notice some delusions which prevail on this subject.
I. The kind of love here required.
You will readily see that this is a vital question. How can we hope to obey this
first and great commandment, unless we understand what it requires?
- 1. I observe then first that it must be a voluntary thing -- not involuntary,
as is shown plainly by the fact that it is required. Nothing but what is voluntary
can be properly demanded. The justice of God forbids Him to require and demand on
pain of damnation, things that are beyond our power to do -- that lie not within
the control of our voluntary powers. This fundamental precept of the law cannot therefore
be a thing of such sort that we have no voluntary power to do it. In all reasonable
law, every precept requires only voluntary action; otherwise it is absurd.
- 2. It is an essential feature in the character of this love, that it be supreme
-- else it cannot be right in kind. The language used by our Lord most fully implies
this -- "Thou shalt love with all thy heart and with all thy soul and with all
thy mind."
- 3. It must be an abiding love. It must be a state of good-will, as distinguished
from transient acts. A state of mind that is continuous must manifestly be implied
and required.
II. I must next notice some things implied in this love.
- 1. If this love be good-will -- a perpetual purposing to promote the highest
happiness of all, then it must imply a life devoted to this object. The love of the
heart naturally and surely controls the life. Supreme love to God must therefore
imply supreme devotion of the life to God, and by this I mean, to pleasing God and
doing faithfully all His known will. If love be supreme and abiding, it must forever
control the life and hold it to perpetual devotion, to the things that please God.
Here some will ask -- "What can we do for God? What should He care what we
do?"
Ah, do you assume that God does not care what we do? Did God have no care for it
when those two young men shot down a father and mother in the field, and left their
children orphans? To suppose this, were to suppose that He is no Father of His creatures
at all.
- 2. Again, this law of love implies that we find our highest pleasure in seeking
to know and do God's pleasure. If we have this love, it will be most grateful to
us to please Him. It will be a richer joy to us to please God than to please ourselves.
It will be our supreme pleasure to please God. We shall devote ourselves to pleasing
Him and shall both seek and find our chief joy in this.
We sometimes see human beings so devoted to each other that they find their supreme
pleasure in promoting each other's welfare. Such devotion, obedience to this great
law implies, towards God.
- 3. Again, the exercise of this love implies a sympathy with whatever pleases
God, so that anything that anybody does to please God will surely please us. We shall
naturally have a great complacency with anything that pleases God.
- 4. On the same principle, it implies a state of mind that will be pained with
anything that displeases God. If we love God supremely, we shall account anything
done against God as if it were done against ourselves -- nay, more painful than if
done against ourselves merely. It will give us more pain than if done against ourselves
only.
- 5. Of course it also implies that we are joyful in the exercise of self-denial
for Christ's sake.
It sometimes happens that persons receiving favors from us, express so much gratitude
that we are ready to thank them for the privilege of doing anything for them. See
that little child sick and faint; she motions for a drink of water. Poor child; she
can only lisp out, "Thank you, Ma!" Her mother did not need those uttered
thanks. The grateful look sufficed. Nay, she so loved that dear sick one that it
was joy enough for her to do anything for her welfare, because of the love she bore.
You have felt this. You have felt such love, and such joy in doing any kindness to
one you love that you were ready to thank that dear one for the privilege of doing
him any good. Your heart has been so set on doing good that you have felt it more
blessed to give than to receive.
So God feels. God's love is of this sort -- pure good-willing -- pure love of doing
all the good He can safely and wisely, to His children. His children feel so towards
Him. If they can do anything for His cause, it is the highest joy of their heart.
Suppose the Lord were to say to some of you -- You may do any way you please. Would
you not at once reply -- Not so, Lord, but rather anything that pleases Thee? Nothing
else can ever please me, but doing what pleases Thee. What do I live for but to please
and honor Thee?
- 6. If you find one who cannot deny himself, but chooses his ways to please himself
otherwise than in pleasing God, you may know he does not love God.
- 7. If you seek anyone's good with real love, you will certainly avail yourself
to every means to learn what will please him. So of loving and pleasing God.
- 8. Of course supreme love implies a greater dread of displeasing God than of
displeasing anyone else. Nothing will distress one who loves God, so much as the
thought of displeasing Him.
You may each and all, apply every one of these principles warm and fresh, to your
own heart in self-examination. Say, does my love to God bear this test?
- 9. Again, if you truly love God, there will always be a spontaneous sorrow if
you become conscious of having displeased Him. If you should be overcome by temptation,
you would not need to make a great effort to feel sorry for it. When you have injured
any friend whom you love more than any other being, you can easily regret and sorrow
over the sad wrong.
- 10. Again, when the heart is supremely engrossed with love to God, the thoughts
will turn naturally towards Him. Where our treasure is, there will our heart be also.
- 11. Moreover God will become the object of our complacent affections. The fact
that He is infinitely lovely and good, will secure in our hearts an intense complacency
in His character, words, and ways.
- 12. We shall find supreme satisfaction in His service. We always find most satisfaction
while pursuing the objects on which our affections are concentrated.
- 13. There will be a perpetual reference to God in all we do. Take the case of
a man supremely devoted to his family; he will see everything in the light of its
bearing on his family. So a father will do for his children if he supremely loves
them. So a husband for his wife; every thing will be referred to the question of
the happiness of the loved one. Thus real love to any friend begets spontaneous sympathy
with him and with all his interests, and equally spontaneous sympathy against all
his enemies.
III. I must next enquire -- What are the grounds of this obligation to love
God?
It is not that God has commanded it. We do not and cannot love merely out of regard
to authority. God does not expect that His mere authority will beget and ensure love.
But He bases His claim for our love on His own infinite worthiness, and on the infinite
importance of having His creatures obey Him. The obligation to love God must always
be equal to the value of God's happiness and glory, and to the good of His creatures
as depending on His relations to them. To withhold due love from God is therefore
to derogate from His rights and claims, and by consequence, from the rights and claims
of the universe He has made and rules over to bless.
IV. Next let us notice the natural consequences of refusing to render this supreme
love and service to God.
- 1. First, refusing to love God, you must inevitably lose all true peace of mind.
Every rational being is so constituted that he cannot be satisfied unless he gives
God his heart's best love. He cannot have peace with God, nor peace with himself.
So long as this love is withheld, his soul will be uneasy and jarring because supremely
selfish. [sic.]
- 2. Then also there are governmental consequences. God must condemn those who
deny to Him the love of their heart and the devotion of their life. He must regard
them with holy displeasure. By all the love He bears to the best interest of His
creatures, He must disown and be displeased with those who array themselves against
Himself and His great family. He is bound to reveal to all His creatures His displeasure
against those who hate both Him and them. He ought to make the fact of this displeasure
as patent as He possibly can, for the happiness of the universe depends upon His
revealing it most fully. He should make the revelations of His heart and of His hand
against sin as nearly according to the right and justice of the case as He can.
- 3. Consequently He must make this revelation as enduring as His own governement.
Both the natural and governmental consequences of sin must be as enduring and as
striking as God can make them. Else God cannot do justice to His responsibilities
as the Great Moral Father of the universe.
V. I must next notice some delusions which prevail on this subject.
- 1. Men get up some other standard of right. By a sort of mutual consent or conventionalism,
they frame a code of morals in trade -- morals in social life or in politics, and
then take great credit to themselves for having done right.
Now let men devise their own codes and notions as they may, this law of God is
forevermore the one great and only standard of right. Nothing is right except it
be in accordance with this law. If men talk about doing right, on any rule of right
short of this, they egregiously deceive themselves. What do you mean to doing right?
Do you mean that your life is a constant offering to God? Do you offer yourself to
God as a living sacrifice? If not, why do you talk about pleasing God? Do you say
-- I pay all my debts; I live fairly in society; I injure no man?
Suppose it were true that you were doing no wrong to your neighbor, yet how is the
case between your own soul and God? If you care nothing for Him, what is this but,
as far lies in you, to dethrone God, to deny His right to reign, and to deny His
parental love and care over all His creatures?
Place before your mind a band of robbers, outlaws against all human governments.
They may have what they are pleased to call excellent rules among themselves; they
may treat each other with great kindness; when they have sallied out of their fastness
and come down upon some lovely, quiet village; burned down their houses, murdered
whoever resists, and plundered them of everything they care for, they go back, and
divide this booty perhaps very honorably among each other; they are careful to provide
for their sick, and they take great interest in training themselves to adroitness
and skill so as to rob and murder with the best success.
Now what of all the good and right things in these bandits? What would you think
of them if they were to justify themselves before the bar of mankind, by appealing
to their kindness to each other, their justice to each other, and their great diligence
in caring for everything that would make them good and successful robbers?
Just so, all sinners are out-laws as to God. They have their own ways and choose
none of His; as towards God their whole spirit is transgression, just as the band
of robbers subsist on the principle of setting at nought all human governments, and
abjuring all obligation to seek or to respect the welfare of their fellow beings,
outside of their own pale.
A gang of these outlawed freebooters, if arrested and brought before a court of justice,
might be very apt to say, if they dared -- Why, what evil have we done? Naturally,
if they chance to escape, they go back to their comrades and appeal to them -- Have
not we done right? Are not we all good fellows? To which the whole band respond --
"First rate; all noble and true, generous fellows!"
A pretty farce this, to play before the face of the civilized world!
Suppose a pirate ship should be fitted up with her black flag and cross bows and
her brave buccaneers, and then boast of being the best managed ship on the seas.
Nowhere, say they, can you find seamen so experienced, so brave, so faithful to their
commander; nowhere else officers so daring and so true.
But what commendations are these to pirates? Do they sanctify the guilty business
of piracy?
But the pirate may still ask -- What have I done? Pause and see what. Just what the
selfishness and wickedness of your heart has prompted; nothing else; nothing better.
Men could do nothing in the pirate's business without these virtues. Those therefore
who choose a pirate's life must pay at least so much homage to virtue as to be truthful,
kind and generous to each other. And then shall they be blind enough to plead in
self-defense that they are very moral pirates -- very kind and true to one another,
and very much devoted to their business?
- 2. Like the self-justifying pirate, so the sinner asks -- What have I done? Done?
You have waged war against God and all the nations of men. And can you call that,
doing right? Will you plead that you are trying to do right?
It is a very simple thing to examine yourself and to know whether you are right
as before God and His law. Is it your great aim to please God? Is it the business
of your life? What have you done today to learn His will and to do His pleasure?
Have you given yourself to prayer and to the faithful study of His word? Have you
been seeking in all possible ways to please and honor your Father in heaven? Have
you not been pluming yourself to display your beauty? Or is it true that you really
bathe yourself in His presence all the day long and deem yourself blest then and
then only then when you have the consciousness of pleasing Him?
"Be not deceived; God is not mocked; whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he
also reap."
GLOSSARY
of easily misunderstood terms as defined by Mr. Finney himself.
Compiled by Katie Stewart
- Complacency, or Esteem: "Complacency, as a state of will or heart,
is only benevolence modified by the consideration or relation of right character
in the object of it. God, prophets, apostles, martyrs, and saints, in all ages, are
as virtuous in their self-denying and untiring labours to save the wicked, as they
are in their complacent love to the saints." Systematic Theology (LECTURE
VII). Also, "approbation of the character of its object. Complacency is
due only to the good and holy." Lectures to Professing Christians (LECTURE
XII).
- Disinterested Benevolence: "By disinterested benevolence I do not
mean, that a person who is disinterested feels no interest in his object of pursuit,
but that he seeks the happiness of others for its own sake, and not for the sake
of its reaction on himself, in promoting his own happiness. He chooses to do good
because he rejoices in the happiness of others, and desires their happiness for its
own sake. God is purely and disinterestedly benevolent. He does not make His creatures
happy for the sake of thereby promoting His own happiness, but because He loves their
happiness and chooses it for its own sake. Not that He does not feel happy in promoting
the happiness of His creatures, but that He does not do it for the sake of His own
gratification." Lectures to Professing Christians (LECTURE I).
- Divine Sovereignty: "The sovereignty of God consists in the independence
of his will, in consulting his own intelligence and discretion, in the selection
of his end, and the means of accomplishing it. In other words, the sovereignty of
God is nothing else than infinite benevolence directed by infinite knowledge."
Systematic Theology (LECTURE LXXVI).
- Election: "That all of Adam's race, who are or ever will be saved,
were from eternity chosen by God to eternal salvation, through the sanctification
of their hearts by faith in Christ. In other words, they are chosen to salvation
by means of sanctification. Their salvation is the end- their sanctification is a
means. Both the end and the means are elected, appointed, chosen; the means as really
as the end, and for the sake of the end." Systematic Theology (LECTURE LXXIV).
- Entire Sanctification: "Sanctification may be entire in two senses:
(1.) In the sense of present, full obedience, or entire consecration to God; and,
(2.) In the sense of continued, abiding consecration or obedience to God. Entire
sanctification, when the terms are used in this sense, consists in being established,
confirmed, preserved, continued in a state of sanctification or of entire consecration
to God." Systematic Theology (LECTURE LVIII).
- Moral Agency: "Moral agency is universally a condition of moral obligation.
The attributes of moral agency are intellect, sensibility, and free will." Systematic
Theology (LECTURE III).
- Moral Depravity: "Moral depravity is the depravity of free-will,
not of the faculty itself, but of its free action. It consists in a violation of
moral law. Depravity of the will, as a faculty, is, or would be, physical, and not
moral depravity. It would be depravity of substance, and not of free, responsible
choice. Moral depravity is depravity of choice. It is a choice at variance with moral
law, moral right. It is synonymous with sin or sinfulness. It is moral depravity,
because it consists in a violation of moral law, and because it has moral character."
Systematic Theology (LECTURE XXXVIII).
- Human Reason: "the intuitive faculty or function of the intellect...
it is the faculty that intuits moral relations and affirms moral obligation to act
in conformity with perceived moral relations." Systematic Theology (LECTURE
III).
- Retributive Justice: "Retributive justice consists in treating every
subject of government according to his character. It respects the intrinsic merit
or demerit of each individual, and deals with him accordingly." Systematic
Theology (LECTURE XXXIV).
- Total Depravity: "Moral depravity of the unregenerate is without
any mixture of moral goodness or virtue, that while they remain unregenerate, they
never in any instance, nor in any degree, exercise true love to God and to man."
Systematic Theology (LECTURE XXXVIII).
- Unbelief: "the soul's withholding confidence from truth and the God
of truth. The heart's rejection of evidence, and refusal to be influenced by it.
The will in the attitude of opposition to truth perceived, or evidence presented."
Systematic Theology (LECTURE LV).
.
Next "Oberlin
Evangelist"
RELATED STUDY AID:
---New Window
Index for "The
Oberlin Evangelist": Finney:
Voices of Philadelphia